Will the very first illegitimate President of the United State Joe Biden End-Up on most wanted list?
To answer this particular question, we have to establish basic criminal responsibility at course of law upon court process-argument known in legal doctrine, as premeditated crime commitments. An overarching concept in American criminal law is that people may not be punished for committing merely immoral or unethical acts. They can only be punished if that act has been announced beforehand as a crime.
I will refer to Donald Trump Hoax as also known as Russian Hoax involving
US 2016 Election on the basis that the CIA were briefing US Presidents Barrack
Obama including vice President Joe Biden at that time as the years 2015-2016 and
making sure that they understood exactly what it is that Fusion know, how Fusion
know it. As per John Brennan expresion the Head of CIA … “I wanted to not over-brief it and to make
sure the president understood the foundations of our understanding, and also
make sure the president understood how we would be able to collect further on
this, what the limitations were as well as the sensitivity of
it”.
This days the spy business is quite different
than the one under the cold war era, as the general public as average bread
consumer in US will understand. This days the top officers of any spy
organization officially cooperating any way they can. Don’t take my word for it;
let me quote John Brennan the former Head of CIA … “Over the course of my tenure at CIA, I
became, I guess, much closer or had much more engagement with the head of the
FSB, Alexander Bortnikov, with basically the head of
their FBI, than I did with Mikhail Fradkov, the head
of the SVR, the CIA equivalent. I did a lot with Bortnikov on counterterrorism information, engaged with him
quite a bit, met with him a number of times. He, in fact, came to visit me at
CIA headquarters, and I had ongoing conversations with him about what was going
on ...”
At the same time the Propaganda
Machine, as Lamestream Media will expose all … they had been given … regardless
as what intention the agent had at the time-sold-pass such tip to or from intelligence agencies, as that or any info except any genuine
truth.
Let me bring some transparency to
Donald Trump Hoax as also known as Russian Hoax involving US 2016 Election and
let me put these facts that way;
In the 2016 presidential campaign of
Donald Trump who was formally launched on June 16, 2015, at Trump Tower in New
York City. Subsequently Donald Trump become presumptive nominee on May 4, 2016,
Official nominee on July 19, 2016 and won election November 9, 2016 as was
inaugurated January 20, 2017. The head of CIA at that time was John Brannon who
as per his expression - Quote „ I did a
lot with Bortnikov on counterterrorism information,
engaged with him quite a bit, met with him a number of times” contact
Russian FSB wit routine question as a form of news … You guys has something on
D. Trump? … In other words, simple phone call as I guess – Trump is Running for President – so what
you guys have on him ... and the Donald Trump Hoax as Russian Hoax does
start.
There must be a reason as why
Alexander Bortnikov flew from Moscow to Washington DC
in 2015 to shake a hand of the Official CIA Director John Brannon. As a matter
of fact, they had a meeting scheduled on 18–19 November 2015 at the 23rd
Philippines Pasay Asia-Pacific Economic Cooperation so they can exchange all
they need or any needed materials. But in case of securities check Mr. Brannon
be mark on political ground, as the person who had or carry any dirt on Donald
Trump. So, it will be much safer if the dirt be deliver by Russian diplomat with
immunity, as no one can even try to look to those materials. And don’t take my
words for it; let me quote John Brannan; “I welcomed the head of the Russian FSB
[Federal Security Service], Alexander Bortnikov, to
the CIA last year [2015]. And I walked with him across the lobby, across our
infamous CIA seal there. It was rather surreal, that the head of the FSB and the
head of the CIA were walking together”
At the hearing IN THE HIGH COURT OF
JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION MEDIA AND COMMUNICATIONS LIST Royal Courts of
Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL in front of Rt Hon. Lord Justice Warby – Sir. Mark David John Warby
PC, Judge in Charge of the Media and Communications List London. - Hearing
dates: 16 - 19 March 2020 referring to Christopher Steele and the Steele Dossier
has been explained in legal dispute in-between the defendant representative
Gavin Millar QC and claimants representative Hugh Tomlinson QC as legal argument
– in doctrine Quote; "The defendant
seeks to divide the processing into two categories: Fusion disclosure and what
they call national security disclosure" where both party were arguing
national security disclosure issue. Finally, the Justice Warby grant the defendant Gavin Millar QC well establish
evidence that there’s national security issue and the source shall not be
reviled for security reason. Upon deep research and as it is deriving from the
court record there were two different Fusion in issue ignored by the Propaganda
Machine, as Lamestream Media. The firs one was Fusion
GPS acting in the best interest of Democratic National Committee DNC and Hillary
Clinton used as coverup and real Fusion which was protected by the Law on
national security ground.
So, the question hereby is; as What
Fusion were protected by the law? … As you will go through the Christopher
Steele London Hearing a specially on March 17 and 18 of 2020 there were two
different fusion acted in this subject matter case issue. The first one
explained by John Brennan clip below and second as coverup Fusion GPS on behalf
DNC. Christopher Steele in his testimony expressing freely and use only the word
Fusion while the defendant Hugh Tomlinson QC being distorted states Fusion GPS
and force Christopher Steele to admit it.
Then, how we can get to that conclusions? Well let me quote John Brannan again. Referring to CIA-FBI Fusion “That data, which was multifaceted, had to, again, be protected. Then we started to bring others into it. And that’s why I decided, early on, that having experienced the run-up to 9/11, where data from one organization was not shared with the others, and so intelligence dots were not connected, I decided that we were going to establish a fusion cell inside of CIA that was going to have NSA and FBI there, and I wanted people to be able to share as much as they could among each other.”
And since I took the step to Christopher Steele, let me bring to your attention as what he Christopher Steele does said about the source of his dossier materials.
The source is said to be a senior
member of the Russian presidential administration. One assumes that a senior
member of the Russian presidential administration is perhaps more senior than a
top-level government official. This is an assertion made baldly in an
intelligence memorandum, without any detailed explanation of the basis on which
this assertion is made. The reader would conclude that the source was aware of
specific conduct by the claimants in question, carried out at the request of Mr.
Putin. The evidence on this and the next issue comes of course from Mr. Steele.
His account is that the Dossier comprised intelligence obtained from 3 sources
and approximately 20 sub-sources, all of whose identities were known to him. His
contacts were with the sources. He met the sources and, during the meeting, made
a manuscript note of what he was told. Within a day or so, he would compile a
memorandum. He kept the manuscript notes for as long as necessary for that
purpose, then destroyed them. Memorandum 112 was based on intelligence provided
by a single source and a single sub-source. Mr. Steele had a 2-hour meeting with
the source, and wrote up the memorandum shortly after, destroying the manuscript
notes.
Christopher Steele - “I assessed the intelligence I received
having regard to what I knew of the sources and sub-sources and their roles, my
knowledge of the structure of the Russian political system and its
inter-connections with business, and the credibility of their story. I asked
others about the individual source or sub-source and their story, and I
cross-referenced the information I received against open source data where
possible. I asked myself whether the appearance of the information (for example,
whether it seemed sensationalist, had any discrepancies or any seemingly
misleading information etc.), the access of the individual, and the story itself
added up and tallied with the intelligence being received from others, and was
consistent with my own knowledge and experience. I did not take what was said at
face value but instead looked at the open source data pertaining to the
individuals involved, other reporting, including that provided by other sources,
and tried to find out whether other government and intelligence institutions
internationally had any relevant intelligence to corroborate or contradict the
intelligence we received.” Mr. Steele adds that the source and sub-source
were established connections of his, whom he trusted. He says he “knew that they
were in a position to report to me accurately” and that both “had a very good
reporting record”. He explains what this means: that contributions they made on
previous occasions had either been corroborated by others or had “turned out to
be the case from open source and events on the ground”.
So now when we understand as what Fusion Christopher Steele had on his mind, let’s try to establish the source of this Donald Trump Hoax as Russian Hoax worked by Christopher Steele.
Base on the above and other statement made at the hearing IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUSTICE QUEEN'S BENCH DIVISION MEDIA AND COMMUNICATIONS LIST Royal Courts of Justice Strand, London, WC2A 2LL in front of Rt Hon. Lord Justice Warby – Sir. Mark David John Warby PC, Judge in Charge of the Media and Communications List London. We know that the main source was a member of the Kremlin-Alpha Group Co-operation. Quote from the hearing - “Interestingly enough, when we asked about where this individual was, they said that they couldn’t - - in the request for further information, they said they couldn’t tell us because that would be jigsaw identification. Mr. Steele, following this interaction with his source, produced Memorandum 112. As the court knows, this is entitled, "Company Intelligence Report 2016/112 Russia/US Presidential Election Kremlin-Alpha Group Co-operation". Moreover, we know that the source was at KGB agent at the time of formation, what further means we can count about 500 individuals. We also know that the source was working at these, St. Petersburg and Leningrad Oblast Directorate of FSB and its predecessors. What allowed for us to narrow the individuals to about 40 in numbers. We also know that the source had previous and current contact with Vladimir Putin, what will narrow the source to about 5 members. We know also that the source is currently high ranking Russian Government, what bring us to one individual, nonother then Alexander Bortnikov himself. Alexander Vasilyevich Bortnikov is a Russian official. He has been Director of the FSB since 12 May 2008. He belongs to the Siloviki of Putin's inner circle.
So, the question then will remain as will Special counsel-prosecutor John Durham see the facts presented to you the same way as we see it?
Mr. Brennan has taken credit for
launching the Trump investigation. At a House Intelligence Committee hearing in
May 2017, he explained that he became “aware of intelligence and information
about contacts between Russian officials and U.S. persons.” The CIA can’t
investigate U.S. citizens, but he made sure that “every information and bit of
intelligence” was “shared with the bureau,” meaning the FBI. This information,
he said, “served as the basis for the FBI investigation.” My sources suggest Mr.
Brennan was overstating his initial role, but either way, by his own testimony,
he as an Obama-Clinton partisan was pushing information to the FBI and
pressuring it to act.
By Peter von Roggenhausen Dec. 14 2021.
